<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Have Social Media and Ecommerce Become a new SEO Tool?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.zencartoptimization.com/2009/11/14/have-social-media-and-ecommerce-become-a-new-seo-tool/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.zencartoptimization.com/2009/11/14/have-social-media-and-ecommerce-become-a-new-seo-tool/</link>
	<description>Practical How To's for Increasing Ecommerce Sales</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 13 Mar 2010 14:26:34 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Erin</title>
		<link>http://www.zencartoptimization.com/2009/11/14/have-social-media-and-ecommerce-become-a-new-seo-tool/comment-page-1/#comment-16526</link>
		<dc:creator>Erin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Nov 2009 12:09:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.zencartoptimization.com/?p=227#comment-16526</guid>
		<description>SEO is not an exact science. Google purposefully changes its algorithms periodically as to avoid anyone taking control over any particular keyword or phrase. 

However, there are two things that are consistent insofar as how to achieve high search engine results ranking: keywords and links. 

Keywords, as expected, will help people find your site. 

Links, as Google and other Search Engines see it, are considered a means to show your &quot;expertise&quot; on a certain subject. The more sites, people, things, etc. that link to you (as well as inbound links and outbound links your site has), the more your site appears to be an expert on the topic. Google and the other search engines report query results based on which site seems like the best &quot;expert&quot; on the topic. 

While you could buy billions of visits, the tactic would only work in the short term as Google also has been known to punish (for lack of a better word) sites it feels have abused the system. At that point, the sites who appear to have purchased their way to the top are sent to the back of the search engine line.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>SEO is not an exact science. Google purposefully changes its algorithms periodically as to avoid anyone taking control over any particular keyword or phrase. </p>
<p>However, there are two things that are consistent insofar as how to achieve high search engine results ranking: keywords and links. </p>
<p>Keywords, as expected, will help people find your site. </p>
<p>Links, as Google and other Search Engines see it, are considered a means to show your &#8220;expertise&#8221; on a certain subject. The more sites, people, things, etc. that link to you (as well as inbound links and outbound links your site has), the more your site appears to be an expert on the topic. Google and the other search engines report query results based on which site seems like the best &#8220;expert&#8221; on the topic. </p>
<p>While you could buy billions of visits, the tactic would only work in the short term as Google also has been known to punish (for lack of a better word) sites it feels have abused the system. At that point, the sites who appear to have purchased their way to the top are sent to the back of the search engine line.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eric</title>
		<link>http://www.zencartoptimization.com/2009/11/14/have-social-media-and-ecommerce-become-a-new-seo-tool/comment-page-1/#comment-16513</link>
		<dc:creator>Eric</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Nov 2009 00:51:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.zencartoptimization.com/?p=227#comment-16513</guid>
		<description>You have a good point here. I know that Twitter is starting to feed the engines with results but not sure what Erin was getting at in that statement.

Erin? Can you clarify?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You have a good point here. I know that Twitter is starting to feed the engines with results but not sure what Erin was getting at in that statement.</p>
<p>Erin? Can you clarify?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: blackhalo</title>
		<link>http://www.zencartoptimization.com/2009/11/14/have-social-media-and-ecommerce-become-a-new-seo-tool/comment-page-1/#comment-16504</link>
		<dc:creator>blackhalo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Nov 2009 20:43:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.zencartoptimization.com/?p=227#comment-16504</guid>
		<description>YOU WROTE:
&quot;The more you entice potential customers to come to your site, the more inbound traffic you’ll receive. This, in turn, results in higher search engine rank.&quot;

This statement is totally wrong...
inbound traffic has nothing to do with Search Engine rankings.

If what you say is true... I could purchase Billions of visits from exit traffic, popunders, etc... and ultimately dominate the number one position for every keyword I choose.

Google and SEO is nowhere near that easy...
the only value in social marketing is word-of-mouth and direct traffic.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>YOU WROTE:<br />
&#8220;The more you entice potential customers to come to your site, the more inbound traffic you’ll receive. This, in turn, results in higher search engine rank.&#8221;</p>
<p>This statement is totally wrong&#8230;<br />
inbound traffic has nothing to do with Search Engine rankings.</p>
<p>If what you say is true&#8230; I could purchase Billions of visits from exit traffic, popunders, etc&#8230; and ultimately dominate the number one position for every keyword I choose.</p>
<p>Google and SEO is nowhere near that easy&#8230;<br />
the only value in social marketing is word-of-mouth and direct traffic.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

